Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Lucio Ratti vs Twan Van Zijl Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ratti vs Zijl analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On This Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Lucio Ratti vs Twan Van Zijl Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Ratti 0 - 0 Zijl
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ratti has won 45.56% of points on their second serve, while Zijl has won 46.75%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ratti, in recent form, has won 60.33% of their opponent's second serve points, while Zijl has won 49.07%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.89% and 30.88% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ratti has saved 55.93% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zijl has saved 52.08% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ratti has won 50% of matches played (W/L 25/ 25), with Zijl winning 53.85% (W/L 21/ 18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ratti has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 75% (W/L 3/ 1), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Zijl has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 26/ 15), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 41% (W/L 11/ 16).
- Player level: In the last year, Ratti has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 51.02% of matches (W/L 25/ 24), where as Zijl has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 53.85% of matches (W/L 21/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ratti has played against opponents with an average rank of 79.42 while Zijl has played against players with an average rank of 9.36.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ratti has won 30% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zijl has won 70% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ratti has converted 46.67% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zijl has converted 50% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
20
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
Form
48% (41-45)
Career Total W/L
54% (37-31)
60% (18-12)
YTD W/L
50% (9-9)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Lucio Ratti vs Twan Van Zijl For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Ratti VS Zijl
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Lucio Ratti | Twan Van Zijl |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 60% (18/12) | 50% (9/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (38/27) | 45% (19/23) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (328/250) | 50% (208/211) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 75% (3/1) | 64% (7/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 60% (15/10) | 29% (2/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.06 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 16 | 1 |
| DFs per game | 0.24 | 0.02 |
| DFs Total | 69 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 65.13 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (548/886) | 79% (295/372) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (338/548) | 54% (158/295) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (154/338) | 47% (36/77) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (42/90) | 50% (10/20) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (357/865) | 37% (116/312) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 60% (18/12) | 50% (9/9) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (18/30) | 50% (9/18) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 20% (1/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (3/5) | 83% (5/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 94% (17/16) | 100% (6/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 6% (17/1) | 0% (6/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 15% (13/2) | 25% (12/3) |
Lucio Ratti Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Niels Lootsma
Player
Lucio Ratti
67%
(
50 of
75)
1st Serve %
60%
(
48 of
80)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
81
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Augusto dos Santos
Player
Lucio Ratti
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
15%
(
6 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lautaro Agustin Falabella
Player
Lucio Ratti
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 7-5 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Alejo Lorenzo Lingua Lavallen
Player
Lucio Ratti
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
17 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Twan Van Zijl Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Gilles Arnaud Bailly
Player
Twan Van Zijl
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
77%
(
36 of
47)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Michiel De Krom
Player
Twan Van Zijl
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve %
83%
(
43 of
52)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Twan Van Zijl
Player
Brian Bozemoj
77%
(
100 of
130)
1st Serve %
56%
(
57 of
101)
0
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
9
62%
(
62 of
100)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
42 of
57)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
42%
(
55 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
101)
115
Total Points Won
116
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Maxim Zhukov
Player
Twan Van Zijl
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
78%
(
61 of
78)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
44%
(
28 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
78)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 7-6(7) | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Ratti Vs Zijl Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Ratti are available here and Zijl photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
